Saturday, 7 May 2016

Modi's degree


 I dont know why people keep harping about Modi's degree

 The relevant issue they should raise is whether there has been vikas, as promised by Modi. People, including the youth had voted for Modi in large numbers  because of his slogan of vikas, which meant creation of millions of jobs. I see none. Rather, unemployment has increased. So what has happened in 2 years is the reverse of vikas.

 This is what people should discuss.

North East people


A fb message I received from a person of North East India :

Sir since you have tons of knowledge. I will be happy if you can speak something about the stepmotherly treatment towards North east states if India

My answer

 It is disgraceful. Many people insult North East people, calling them 'Chinkis', and misbehave with them. This must be condemned. North East people are as much Indians as any of us.

 Just because many of them have Mongoloid features does not make them any less Indians.

 It must be realized that India is a country of great diversity ( as it is a country of immigrants, like USA, as mentioned in detail in my blog 'What is India' )---so many religions, castes, languages races,cultures, etc. All must be given equal respect if we are to remain united and prosper
.

What I intend to speak in JNU



If invited to JNU ( and I hope I will), some of the topics on which  I intend to speak will be as follows :
1. How to abolish India's poverty, unemployment, etc. Economic theory
2. What is India
3.Caste
4. Religion
5. Indian politicians and Indian politics
6. Arvind Kejriwal
7.Islam, Sharia and burqa
8. Gandhi, Subhas Chandra Bose and Tagore
9. Science, natural and social.
10. Indian culture, Sanskrit and Urdu
11. The writing of Indian history
12. JNU, Kanhaiya, etc
13. India's future. The transitional age
14. Kashmir
15. Pakistan

I may also speak on some other topics

 Since this is a vast canvas, I may require upto 2 hours for my speech ( during which there should be no interruption ), after which there can be a 2 hour question answer session, in which there can be a free discussion, and I can be criticized. Since this may last upto 4 hours, I request the organizers to start the programme punctually at 4 p.m.

Many of the above topics have already been discussed on my blog justicekatju.blogspot.in, but I will elaborate and clarify further

I am awaiting the invitation. I will be contacted sometime in the evening, as I was told.
It should be a colourful evening
 For further details contact Sunny Dhiman on his mobile 9873732566

Friday, 6 May 2016

Invitation to speak in JNU


A student of JNU telephoned me just now and asked me to address the students of JNU on any day.

 I said that I can come, but on the condition that the students hear me patiently without interruption for some time, and then they can put any questions.But I will not attend a panel discussion
 Also, the JNU students association must pass a resolution inviting me. I do not want any controversy that only one section of students have invited me, while others have not.

 If invited, I intend to begin my speech by saying that JNU is a highly overrated institution, and I have a poor opinion about it, and students like Kanhaiya, etc.

Of course the students of JNU know how to shout 'halla bol', 'azadi', etc, but there is no deep scientific analysis of the country's problems and how to solve them.. It reminds me of a line in Shakespeare's Macbeth ' It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing '.

Some JNU students are regarded great orators and revolutionaries, but if after hearing them  one asks what is the substance of what they have said one finds it was all empty froth.

The main problems of the country are socio-economic---massive poverty, massive unemployment, massive malnutrition, massive lack of healthcare and good education, etc. What is the solution offered to solve these massive problems by Kanhaiya and the other 'heroes' of JNU? It is zero.

 So if invited I will dwell on these issues and present my solutions.

 Let us see whether the invitation comes at all..

Har zarre par ek kaifiyat-e-neemshabi hai  –
 Ai Saaqi-e- dauraan yeh gunahon ki ghadi hai
                                 
                                            - Firaq Gorakhpuri
In a marvel of condensation this sher (couplet) reflects the transitional age through which India is passing, from fuedal society to a modern industrial society. At present we are neither totally feudal nor totally modern, but partly both.
. Zarra means particle, kaifiyat means condition, e means of, neem means half, and shab means night. So the first line in the couplet literally means
“Every particle is in a condition of half night”.
Urdu poetry is often to be understood figuratively, not literally. So this line really means that (in the transitional age) everything is in flux, neither night nor day, neither the old order nor the new. Also, in the middle of the night if we get up we are dazed, in a state of mental confusion, and so are people in a transitional age.
In the second line, saaqi is the girl who fills the wine cup, but she is also the person to whom one can confide the innermost thoughts in one’s mind. The poet is imagining a girl, to whom he is describing the features of the transitional era.
Yeh gunahon ki ghadi hai’, i.e. it is the time of sin. In this transitional age it is a ‘gunahon ki ghadi’ from both points of view. From the point of view of people of the old, feudal order it is a sin to marry according to your choice, and particularly outside one’s caste or religion, it is a sin to give education to women, it is a sin to treat everyone as equal.
At the same time, from the point of view of modern minded people the caste system is a sin, denying education to girls is a sin, and love marriage is quite acceptable. Thus old and new ideas are battling with each other in the transitional age.
 This state of affairs is likely to continue in India for another 10-20 years., after which a modern just social order will be created, in which everyone will get a decent life, i.e. employment, proper education and healthcare, nutritious food, etc

Wednesday, 4 May 2016

Urdu Poetry


Many of you who do not know Urdu have shown an interest in Urdu poetry. So I shall briefly tell you something about its features.

Urdu poets often write their verses not in a direct way but in a roundabout way, conveying their meaning indirectly by hints, allusions and indications. The result is that the same verse can have two or even multiple meanings. Sometimes it can even have a meaning which the poet never contemplated, but is invented by the reader using his creative imagination !


The greatest Urdu poet Ghalib was of the view that the language of poetry should not be the same as the spoken language of the common man. Ghalib had a horror of the commonplace in expression, and this often makes his poetry obscure. His early poems were highly Persianized, and therefore often difficult to understand. His biographer Hali wrote that about one third of Ghalib's verses can hardly be called Urdu, and even till today some of his verses are difficult to understand.


Urdu poetry has several forms (borrowed from Persian poetry) e.g. ghazal, qasida, marsiya, rubai, etc The most popular of these is the ghazal, and I shall only discuss that here.


Ghazal means conversation with women, and originally it was used for erotic themes. Later, however, the erotic meaning became only the outer, superficial meaning, while the deeper, inner meaning became the real meaning which the poet wanted to convey. For example the word 'Ishq' used by Urdu poets often does not mean love between a man and a woman. It is often used in the mystic Sufi sense of love for God, or it can mean a passion for an ideal for which a person is willing to make sacrifices.


Thus,when the poet Faiz writes of love and longing for the beloved he is really dealing with social and political issues, though in an indirect way.


Ghazals are written in couplets called sher, each line of a sher being called a misra. A nazm (poem) often contains several shers, but each sher can be a self contained unit having no thematic connection with other shers in the nazm ( though there can also be a nazm having shers with a common theme). Where the shers are self contained units, it is often a marvel of condensation. Within two lines, great ideas or emotions are expressed in a powerful way.


All forms of Urdu poetry are not ghazal. To be a ghazal 5 strict rules have to be followed. These are radeef, kafiya, matla, maqta, and beher. If these are not in the poem it is not a ghazal. 


To explain these let us take a well known poem of the great Urdu poet Faiz :
"Gulon mein rang bhare baad-e-naubahaar chale
Chale bhi ao ki gulshan ka kaarobar chale
Qafas udaas hai yaaron sabaa se kuch to kaho
Kaheen to beher-e-khuda aaj zikr-e-yaar chale
Kabhi to subah tere kunj-e-lab se ho aaghaz
Kabhi to shab sar-e-kaakul se mushkabar chale
Bara hai dard ka rishta ye dil gharib sahi
Tumhaare naam pe aenge ghamghusaar chale
Jo hum pe ghuzri so ghuzri magar shab-e-hijraan
Hamare Ashk teri aaqabat sanwaar chale
Huzoor-e-yaar hui dafter-e-junoon ki talab
Girah mein leke garebaan ka taar taar chale
Maqaam Faiz koi raah mein jacha hi nahin
Jo koo-e-yaar se nikle to soo-e-daar chale"

This poem has ghazals, that is , it has radeef, kafiya, matla, maqta, and beher. 


Let us consider these one by one.
Radeef is the last word (or words) in a line which is a repetition. In the above poem the radeef is the single word 'chale' ( though in some ghazals the radeef has more than one word).


In the first couplet, which is called a matla, there must be radeef in both the misras (lines) of the couplet, but in the succeeding couplets radeef is necessary only in the second misra (line) of the sher. Thus, in the above poem of Faiz, we see that the first couplet has radeef in both the lines (misras) of the matla (first couplet).Both the lines in the matla end with the same word 'chale'. However, in the shers which follow the matla radeef occurs only in the second line.


Now let me explain kafiya. Kafiya is the word (or words) which rhyme with each other, and which precede the radeef. Thus, in the above poem, the word 'naubahaar' preceding the word 'chale' in the first line of the first sher rhymes with the word 'kaarobar'. Kafiya or rhyming word is necessary in both lines of the matla, but necessary only in the second line of the succeeding shers.
Maqta is the last sher of a nazm (poem), and it contains the name or pseudonym (called takhallus)of the poet. Thus, in the above poem, the poet's name, Faiz, occurs in the maqta.
Beher means metre, which are of several kinds, usually short, medium, or long. The same metre must be maintained in every line of the nazm.

Having explained the structural rules of a ghazal, let us consider some other features.
As already mentioned above, a ghazal may have an outer, apparent, and often superficial meaning, and a deeper, inner meaning. Take, for example, the first sher in the above poem of Faiz.

Now the outer, apparent meaning of the sher is :
"In the bloom of flowers a coloured breeze of the new season (spring) is blowing
Come forward so that the work of the garden may be done".

But it is well known that Faiz often writes on political and social issues, disguising them as love poems ( to avoid persecution by the martial law regime of Pakistan, which indeed jailed him for many years). So what is he really trying to convey, however indirectly ?


In this sher the word 'gulshan' really means the country, and the expression 'the coloured breeze of the new spring is blowing' means that the objective situation is ripe for great progressive changes in the country. Therefore Faiz really intends to convey that the objective situation in the country is ripe for the patriotic, justice loving people to rise and come forward to fight for the country.


Hence, when reading Urdu poetry one should try to find out the deeper, inner meaning, which is what the poet is really wanting to convey, though indirectly.
Sometimes the reader can even give to an Urdu sher a meaning which the poet never intended. To give an example, Ghalib writes :
"Pinha tha daam-e-sakht qareeb aashiyan ke
Udhne na paaye the ki giraftaar hum hue "

The word 'pinha' means hidden or concealed, the word 'daam' means net, the word 'sakht' means 'hard', the word 'qareeb' means near, and the word 'aashiyan' means nest.So the sher literally means that near the nest of a bird there was a hard net (placed by a hunter), and the young chick was caught in it even before it could take its first flight.
I used the above sher in a judgment I gave in the Supreme Court, ( Buddhadev Karmaskar vs. State of West Bengal),but I gave it a meaning which could never have been contemplated by Ghalib !



The case related to sex workers in India. There are millions of sex workers in India, and these girls become prostitutes not because they enjoy the profession but due to abject poverty. These poor girls, who should have had a life of happiness, are instead driven into this terrible profession due to poverty. So I compared them to the young chick referred to by Ghalib in his sher, which is caught in the hunter's net even before it could make its first flight. Surely Ghalib could never have imagined that his sher could be given such a meaning !

Great Injustice to Urdu in India


१९६९ में आगरा  में ग़ालिब की देहांत शाताब्दी समारोह जश्न-इ- ग़ालिब  पर साहिर लुधयानवी की पंक्तियाँ

 " जिन शहरों में गूंजी थी ग़ालिब की नवा बरसों
 उन शहरों में अब उर्दू  बेनाम-ओ- निशाँ  ठहरी
 आज़ादी-इ- कामिल का ऐलान हुआ जिस दिन
 मातूब जुबां ठहरी, ग़द्दार ज़ुबाह ठहरी "

  ( नवा माने आवाज़, कामिल माने पूरा, मातूब माने निकृष्ट )

 '' जिस अहद-इ- सियासत ने यह ज़िंदा जुबां कुचली
 उस अहद-इ-सियासत को मेहरूमों का ग़म क्यों है ?
ग़ालिब जिसे कहते हैं  उर्दू का ही शायर था
 उर्दू पर सितम ढा कर ग़ालिब पर करम क्यों है ? ''

 ( अहद माने युग, सियासत माने राजनीति, महरूम माने मृत, सितम माने ज़ुल्म, करम माने कृपा )

Sahir Ludhianvi's verses on the death centenary function Jashn-e in Agra in 1969

“Jin shehron mein goonji thi Ghalib ki nava barson
 Un shehron men ab Urdu benaam-o-nishan thehri
 Azadi-e-kaamil ka ailan hua jis din
 Maa’toob zubaan thehri, ghaddar zubaan thehri ”

i.e.

 In the cities where Ghalib's voice thundered for years
 In those cities now Urdu is now unknown and without a trace
 On the day the announcement of the completion of Independence was made ( i.e.1947 )
 On that day Urdu became a degraded language, a language of traitors

 ( nava means voice, benaam-o-nishaan means unknown and without a trace, kaamil means completion, maatoob means degraded, thehri means became, ghaddar means traitor )
 Jis ahad-e-siyasat ne yeh zinda zubaan kuchli
 Us ahad-e-siyasat ko mehroomon ka gham kyun hai ?
 Ghalib jise kehte hain Urdu hi ka shayer tha
 Urdu par sitam dhaa kar, Ghalib par karam kyun hai ? “

i.e.
 The age of politics which crushed this living language
 Why does it mourn for the dead ?
 He who is called Ghalib was a poet of Urdu
 After committing atrocities on Urdu, why do people have generosity for Ghalib ?

 ( ahad means age or era, siyasat means politics, zinda means living, kuchli means crushed, mehroomon means the deceased, shayar means poet, sitam means atrocity, karam means generosity or benevolence )
 P.S.

 To know about Urdu, read my article ' What is Urdu ' online and on justicekatju.blogspot.in. The video of my speech can be seen on Youtube by clicking ' What is Urdu '

The false claim of Kashmiris that Kashmir was always independent and never part of India




Was Kashmir ever indepenent after 1587 when the last Kashmiri king Yusuf Shah Chak was deposed by the Mughal Emperor Akbar, and Kashmir was incorporated into the Mughal Empire by the great Mughal Emperor Akbar ( the real Father of the Indian nation ) ? 

I keep repeating this question to Kashmiris who claim that Kashmir was always independent, but they keep dodging it, obviously because they know that what I have said is the truth, and what they are saying is not true.. 

Have these Kashmiris even read Akbarnama, Jehangirnama and Shahjahannama with their accounts of visits of Mughal Emperors to Kashmir, which had become a province of the Mughal Empire since the time of Akbar. And who built the Mughal gardens near Srinagar ? They were built by the Mughals, not Kashmiris ?

And the Mughals, since the time of Akbar, were Indians, with their capital at Agra ( later Delhi ), not Srinagar.

After short spells of Afghan, Sikh and Dogra rule, Kashmir came effectively under British rule, though as a princely state ruled by Dogras.

So it was never independent after 1587.

Why do some people keep repeating lies, instead of reading their history books ?

The need for Muslims to become modern

I have always supported Muslims whenever any atrocity or injustice was done to them. But I am an opponent of outdated backward feudal customs and practices among all communities, e.g. the caste system among Hindus and looking down on dalits.
Similarly, I am strongly against oral talaq and burqa among Muslims, and I support the demand of a uniform civil code.
Sharia law has done great harm to Muslims, and has contributed in keeping them backward. The time has come when it must be abolished ( just as the old Hindu Law was abolished in 1955 and 1956 by statutes ). It is only due to vote bank politics and bigotry of some die hard feudal minded Muslims that this has not yet been done. So I support the recent demand of some modern minded Muslim womens organizations in this connection.
The very fact that oral talaq is permitted to only Muslim males, but not to females shows that Sharia treats women as inferior. But some claim that Sharia was made by Allah, and so cannot be abolished. This is nonsense and humbug. Customary non statutory law was not made by anyone, but evolved in accordance with the social syste prevalent at that time. In the middle ages women were everywhere regarded as inferior to men. Thus, according to the old non statutory Hindu Law, a man could marry as many wives as he wanted, but a woman could marry only one husband. This shows that the old Hindu Law too treated women as inferior.
Similarly, wearing burqa is a stupid backward practice. If a woman wears a sari or salwar kameez surely she is not nude. Why should women be kept in a cage ? It is time now that Muslim men tell their wives and other female relatives to discard burqa, and support the demand for abolition of oral talaq.

Nitish and Kejriwal


Some people have asked me why I have now praised Arvind Kejriwal when I had often criticized him in the past.
It is true that earlier I had criticized him because I did not like some things he did e.g. allotting Rs. 536 crores in the Delhi budget for propaganda, the odd even scheme ( which has not reduced pollution ) etc.
But no one is perfect. We are all a combination of good and bad points.
What many persons have been telling me is about the good things Kejriwal has done for Delhi :
(1) He has setup mohalla clinics which provide free medicines and medical care for the poor people of Delhi. This was very much needed since the poor people are often too poor to afford medical care.
(2) He has provided free water to those who consume not more than 20,000 litres per month, and has reduced by half the electricity bills. This is a great relief to the common man
(3) He has got abolished the fee hike in educational institutions, e.g. Delhi Public School. This again is a great relief, as many people could not afford to pay the hiked fees
(4) Businessmen in Delhi are also happy by the reduction of VAT from 12% to 7%, and his strong objection to hike in taxes on jewelry shops etc.
My perception is that Kejriwal is personally honest and intends to do good to the people of Delhi. But he is new in politics and so lacks experience. That is why I suggested him for the post of Deputy Prime Minister, and not Prime Minister However, he will get experience and maturity with passage of time..
He must choose his advisers better ( at present many are only sycophants ).
Many people have criticized me for suggesting Nitish Kumar as the next Prime Minister. I have followed Nitish Kumar's career carefully. He had earlier made some mistakes, for which I had criticized him. But now he seems to have overcome those errors. I have not heard anything against his personal integrity. He is mature and experienced, qualities which Kejriwal needs to develop.
Some people have no doubt criticized Nitish for allying with Lalu Yadav, but in politics one has sometimes to make compromises..This is not a perfect world.
I have also a good opinion of Naveen Patnaik.
It is true that I am no one to appoint Prime Ministers and Deputy Prime Ministers. But as a citizen surely I have a right to present my view.