Tuesday, 10 March 2015

The Real Father of the Indian Nation


 ' Mahatma ' Gandhi is called the father of the Indian nation. But , as I have pointed out in my previous post, Gandhi in fact did great harm to India, and he has wrongly been called the Father of the nation.

 The real Father of the Indian nation was the great Mughal Emperor Akbar ( 1542-1605 ). What we Indians are today is largely because of the solid foundation laid by Akbar. Because of Akbar, we are Indians, not just Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Jains, Parsis etc.

  And yet the tragedy is that many Hindus call Akbar a Muslim, while many Muslims call him a Hindu ( because he observed many Hindu festivals and ceremonies ), which proves my point that 90% Hindus and 90% Muslims in India are fools. The truth is that while being a Sunni Muslim, Akbar was a true Indian.

  Akbar saw that India was a country of great diversity ( see my article ' What is India ? ' on my blog justicekatju.blogspot.in and the website kgfindia.com ). Hence the only way to keep India united was by giving equal respect to all communities and sects. It was because of this realization that Akbar adopted the wise policy of Suleh-e-Kul, that is, Universal Toleration of all Religions.

 In this respect, Akbar was far ahead of his times, and far ahead of even Europeans who were at that time massacring each other in the name of religion, Catholics massacring Protestants e.g. the St. Bartholomew Day massacre in 1572 by Catholics of the minority Protestant community ( called Huguenots ) in France, the massacre of Protestants by the Spanish Duke of Alba in Holland, the burning at the stake ( auto de fe ) of heretics during the Inquisition, etc, the subsequent massacre of Catholics in Ireland by Cromwell, and the mutual massacre of Catholics and Protestants in the Thirty Year War  in Germany ( 1618-1648 ) as well as the killing of Jews by Christians throughout Europe ( culminating in the Holocaust in the Second World War, 1939-1945 ).

 In my judgment in  the Supreme Court in Hinsa Virodhak Sangh vs.Mirzapur Moti Koresh Jamaat, 2011 ( see online ) I observed :
"  The architect of modern India was the great Mughal Emperor Akbar who gave equal respect to people of all communities and appointed them to the highest offices on their merits irrespective of their religion, caste, etc.

The Emperor Akbar held discussions with scholars of all religions and gave respect not only to Muslim scholars, but also to Hindus, Christians, Parsis, Sikhs, etc. Those who came to his court were given respect and the Emperor heard their views, sometimes alone, and sometimes in the Ibadatkhana (Hall of Worship), where people of all religions assembled and discussed their views in a tolerant spirit.

The Emperor declared his policy of Suleh-e-Kul, which meant universal tolerance of all religions and communities. He abolished Jeziya in 1564 and the pilgrim tax in 1563 on Hindus and permitted his Hindu wife to continue to practise her own religion even after their marriage. This is evident from the Jodha Bai Palace in Fatehpur Sikri which is built on Hindu architectural pattern.

In 1578, the Parsi theologian Dastur Meherji Rana was invited to the Emperor 's court and he had detailed discussions with Emperor Akbar and acquainted him about the Parsi religion. Similarly, the Jesuit Priests Father Antonio Monserrate, Father Rodolfo Acquaviva and Father Francisco Enriques etc. also came to the Emperor 's court on his request and acquainted him about the Christian religion. The Emperor also became acquainted with Sikhism and came into contact with Guru Amar Das and Guru Ram Das (see`The Mughal Empire by R.C. Majumdar).

Thus, as stated in the Cambridge History of India (Vol.IV The Mughal Period) Emperor Akbar conceived the idea of becoming the father of all his subjects, rather than the leader of only the Muslims, and he was far ahead of his times. As mentioned by Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru in `The Discovery of India , " Akbar 's success is astonishing, for he created a sense of oneness among the diverse elements of India ".

In 1582, the Emperor invited and received a Jain delegation consisting of Hiravijaya Suri, Bhanuchandra Upadhyaya and Vijayasena Suri. Jainism, with its doctrine of non-violence, made a profound impression on him and influenced his personal life. He curtailed his food and drink and ultimately abstained from flesh diet altogether for several months in the year. He renounced hunting which was his favourite pastime, restricted the practice of fishing and released prisoners and caged birds. Slaughter of animals was prohibited on certain days and ultimately in 1587 for about half the days in the year.

Akbar 's contact with Jains began as early as 1568, when Padma Sunder who belonged to the Nagpuri Tapagaccha was honoured by him.

As mentioned in Dr. Ishwari Prasad 's `The Mughal Empire' , the Jains had a great influence on the Emperor. A disputation was held in Akbar s court between the Jain monks Buddhisagar of Tapgaccha and Suddha Kirti of Khartargaccha on the subject of Jain religious ceremony called Pansadha in which the winner was given the title Jagatguru by Akbar.

Having heard of the virtues and learning of Hir Vijaya Suri in 1582 the Emperor sent an invitation to him through the Mughal Viceroy at Ahmedabad. Suri accepted it in the interests of his religion. He was offered money by the Viceroy to defray the expenses of the journey but he refused. The delegation consisting of Hir Vijaya Suri, Bhanu Chandra Upadhyaya and Vijaya Sen Suri started on their journey and walked on foot to Fatehpur Sikri and were received with great honour befitting imperial guests.

 Hir Vijaya Suri had discussions with Abul Fazl. He propounded the doctrine of Karma and an impersonal God. When he was introduced to the Emperor he defended true religion and told him that the foundation of faith should be daya (compassion) and that God is one though he is differently named by different faiths.

The Emperor received instruction in Dharma from Suri who explained the Jain doctrines to him. He discussed the existence of God and the qualities of a true Guru and recommended non-killing (Ahinsa). The Emperor was persuaded to forbid the slaughter of animals for six months in Gujarat and to abolish the confiscation of the property of deceased persons, the Sujija Tax (Jeziya) and a Sulka (possibly a tax on pilgrims) and to free caged birds and prisoners. He stayed for four years at Akbar' s court and left for Gujarat in 1586. He imparted a knowledge of Jainism to Akbar and obtained various concessions to his religion. The Emperor is said to have taken a vow to refrain from hunting and expressed a desire to leave off meat- eating for ever as it had become repulsive.

When Suri was leaving for Ahmedabad,the Emperor presented to him Padma Sundar scriptures which were preserved in his palace. He offered them to Suri as a gift and he was pressed by the Emperor to accept them. The killing of animals was forbidden for certain days.

Emperor Akbar was a propagator of Suleh-i-Kul (universal toleration) at a time when Europeans 
were indulging in religious massacres e.g. the St. Bartholomew Day massacre in 1572 of Protestants, (called Huguenots) in France by the Catholics, the burning at the stake of Protestants by Queen Mary of England, the massacre by the Duke of Alva of millions of people for their resistance to Rome and the burning at the stake of Jews during the Spanish Inquisition. We may also mention the subsequent massacre of the Catholics in Ireland by Cromwell, and the mutual massacre of Catholics and Protestants in Germany during the thirty year war from 1618 to 1648 in which the population of Germany was reduced from 18 million to 12 million. Thus, Emperor Akbar was far ahead of even the Europeans of his times.

Emperor Akbar himself abstained from eating meat on Fridays and Sundays and on some other days, as has been mentioned in the Ain-I-Akbari by Abul Fazl.
It was because of the wise policy of toleration of the Great Emperor Akbar that the Mughal empire lasted for so long, and hence the same wise policy of toleration alone can keep our country together despite so much diversity. ".

 The tragedy is that the 90% fools and idiots living in India today do not even know who is the real Father of their Nation !

 It is said that Gandhi gave us Independence in 1947. This is totally false. In fact by diverting the genuine revolutionary independence struggle against the British in India ( see my previous post ) to harmless and nonsensical channels like n' Satyagrah ' Gandhi was ensuring that India should not become independent.

 Why then did the British leave ? Surely it was not because of the dramas Gandhi was doing ( fasting, salt march, etc ). Does anyone give up an Empire because of this ?

 No, it was because Germany attacked England in the Second World War and considerably weakened it ( in fact Germany would probably have conquered England if America had not helped it ) that England, realizing that she could not continue holding on to India politically, withdrew. So it is not Gandhi who gave us Independence but Adolf Hitler ( though of course that was not his intention )


54 comments:

  1. SUBJECT : Justice Markandey Katju: Gandhi a British agent . .
    #############################################

    JUSTICE KATJU HAS THE GUTS TO SAY-- HEY, THERE IS AN ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM-- HEY, THE EMPEROR IS NOT WEARING CLOTHES . . .

    GANDHI WAS CREATED / ELIMINATED BY THE SAME GERMAN JEW WHO RULED INDIA ( OWNER OF BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY ) . .

    HE USED CHITPAVAN JEWS GOKHALE/ GODSE FOR THIS . . . .

    India got Independence NOT due to Gandhi or Nehru, but due to a DELETED event . . .

    punch into Google search - - -

    . . . . . THE INDIAN NAVY MUTINY OF 1946, THE ONLY WAR OF INDIAN INDEPENDENCE VADAKAYIL . . . . .

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Katrina Kaif Totally Nude enjoying Sex With Salman Khan on set of movie shoot



      Bollywood actress Soha Ali Khan play with tits and show pussy




      Katrina Kaif Opening Her Bra To Show You Her Sexy Juicy Boobs and Pink Nipples




      Desi indian kaamwali bai showing her breasts when bath at outdoor nude photos





      Indian college girl show her tits and pussy to her boy friend




      Hot busty arabian nurse fucked by her doctor in staff room




      Indian sexy mallu aunty sanooja having sex with her boy friend home video clip




      Hot indian babby cring fucking time,Drunks Desi Girl Raped By Bigger-man





      Desi kolkata village girl naked at home showing black pussy and boobs





      Chubby Indian Girl Licked Dildo Toying On Bed In Her Juicy Pussy





      south indian babe kissing and fingering pussy and puping cock mms video





      Desi Arab wife in burkha sucking penis of her husband





      Arab Nurse Fucking at Hospital She Crying Loudly,Jack nipper fuck hairy big pussy





      Indian college girl fucked By Her Boyfriend Outdoors place





      Genelia D'Souza caught sucking cock,Tamil actress Rakshita showing her ass nude





      Khushboo Nude Showing Big Boobs and unshaved pussy click here





      Hot indian village girl desi tight hole fucked from back side





      Bollywood film actress Ayesha Takia showing her Big White Boobs and Nipples




      Indian maal randdi call girl naked photo shoot





      punjabi indian wife giving her man a blowjob and taking cum inside her mouth





      Delhi cheater wife seducing and fucking by neighbour





      Sexy mallu aunty bathing nude in resorts showing boobs and pussy hot pics




      Indian bhabhi desperate for sex fucked hard by hubby in missionary School




      Hot sexy parineeti chopra bra breast and figure size with stunning exclusive latest photos


      Delete
  2. SUBJECT : Justice Markandey Katju: Gandhi a British agent . .
    #############################################

    JUSTICE KATJU HAS THE GUTS TO SAY-- HEY, THERE IS AN ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM-- HEY, THE EMPEROR IS NOT WEARING CLOTHES . . .

    GANDHI WAS CREATED / ELIMINATED BY THE SAME GERMAN JEW WHO RULED INDIA ( OWNER OF BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY ) . .

    HE USED CHITPAVAN JEWS GOKHALE/ GODSE FOR THIS . . . .

    India got Independence NOT due to Gandhi or Nehru, but due to a DELETED event . . .

    punch into Google search - - -

    . . . . . THE INDIAN NAVY MUTINY OF 1946, THE ONLY WAR OF INDIAN INDEPENDENCE VADAKAYIL . . . . .

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    ReplyDelete
  3. KATJU SAAB – AKBAR WAS A BIGOT- SORRY !

    THE ONLY TRUE SECULAR MUSLIM INVADER LEADER WAS DARA SHIKHO THE ELDEST SON OF SHAH JEHAN / MUMTAZ MAHAL - AND THE BROTHER OF AURANGAZEB .
    IF DARAH SHIKO BECAME EMPEROR INSTEAD OF AURENGAZEB, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO BRITISH RULE - BECAUSE BOTH HINDUS AND MUSLIMS LOVED HIM .
    When he was 12, his grandfather, Emperor Jahangir, died, and his father Shah Jahan succeeded as emperor. If he was 6 years older his grandfather would have given the Mughal empire to him – for Shah Jahan was a RABID power hungry muslim who persecuted Muslims ..
    Jahangir's soldiers had chased young Shah Jehan from Fatehpur Sikri to the Deccan, to Bengal and back to the Deccan, until he surrendered to his father Jehangir unconditionally in 1626. In 1622, Shah Jahan had murdered his blinded elder brother Khusrau in order to eliminate all possible contenders to the throne.

    Emperor Jahangir was the FIRST Mughal king to say that Islam cannot be forced on any Hindu.
    The torture and killing of fifth Sikh Guru Arjan Dev is all hyped up. Rothschild historians wrote that Guru Arjan Dev was tortured and sentenced to death after he refused to remove all Islamic references from the Holy book.
    Those days there was NO Sikh Holy book.
    Sorry !
    YEH JEW BULLSHIT NAHI CHALEGA !!
    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/07/unknown-history-of-sikhs-and-sikhism.html

    Jahangir hung the GOLDEN BELL for Hindus who were persecuted by Islam. That Hindu would get a personal hearing from mighty and busy Emperor Jahangir himself.
    I STUDIED RAHIMs DOHAS IN SCHOOL ( HINDI POEM BOOK- DURGAM PATH KI RAAHI )

    ABDUL RAHIM was a Rajput Hindu poet in the court of Akbar.

    He was a Sanskrit scholar who gave astrological readings to Akbar before his campaigns . A grateful Akbar title of “Mirza Khan” and named a village in Punjab Khankhana, after him.

    Abdul Rahim’s biological father Bairam Khan was honoured by Humayun with the title Khan Khanan, meaning king of kings.

    Following Humayun's death in 1556, Bairam Khan was appointed Regent over the young monarch Akbar.

    Salima Sultan Begum and Bairam Khan did NOT have any children.

    Abdul Rahim was a Bairam Khan’s child from a beautiful Hindu Rajput woman.

    SHE TAUGHT HER CHILD RAHIM HINDU VALUES, SANSKRIT AND ASTROLOGY.

    The white invader created the FAKE TulsiDASA , to regularize the FAKE Radha ( mistress of Lord Krishna).

    All DASAS are fake back dated creations of he immoral white invader.

    The white invader coocked up FAKE conversations between Rahim and Tulsidas – to show that TulsiDASA is real..

    Similarly Tansen was a Hindu—who was called Miya Tansen by Akbar.

    Akhbar was attracted to Bairam Khan’s young and beautiful wife Salima. Akbar sent him on a
    pilgrimage to Mecca and got him murdered enroute.

    After that Akbar married Bairam Khan’s wife Salima Sultan Begum. She was daughter of Akbar’s father Humayun’s sister, Gulrukh.

    Akbar was three years younger than Salima Sultan Begum.

    Bairam Khan became the guardian of Akbar when Akbar was just 13 year old. Bairam Khan was the Chief Military commander in the Mughal Army.

    Bairam Khan was born in Badakhshan and joined the service of Mughal Emperor Babur at the age of 16. Later on Bairam Khan contributed towards the establishment of Mughal Empire in India under Humayun and Akbar.

    The regency of extraordinary military general Bairam Khan lasted for 40 years. Such was the Islamic invader Akbar’s gratitude to a loyal general who served him , his father and his grandfather..

    Crown Prince Prince Murad was the son of Salima Begum and Akbar. Unfortunately, Prince Murad died at the age of 29 .

    Later on, Sakima supported prince Jahangir ( Salim ) to ascend to the throne of Mughal Empire.

    Jehangir was the son of Akbar’s first wife Mariam-uz-Zamani Begum/ Heer Kunwari . She was the first and chief beautiful Rajput Hindu wife of Emperor Akbar.


    CONTINUED TO 2-

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. CONTINUED FROM 1-

      The Bollywood movie Jodha Akbar is just a piece of fiction--it is NOT history by any stretch of the imagination. There was NEVER any Jodha princess whom he married as per Hindus rites .

      Akbar lived most of his life drawing inspiration from the Quran and plundering the Hindus according to the Quranic injunctions.

      Towards the end of his life in the company of honourable Rajputs he abandoned Islam .

      Yet, the He created his won religion named Din-i-Ilahi – which as per Koran makes him an apostate.

      Apostasy alone does not qualify Akbar for greatness. His new religion did not survive beyond his own death, as his son Jehangir hated his father.

      Akbar NEVER EVER build Hindu temples .

      This is like Salman Khurshid making Tipu Sutan a freedom fighter along with the Muslim m apppila murderers of the Moplh revolt ( Khilafat movement Kerala 1921 ). This will NOT work.

      Akbar did marry some Rajput princess, it was a political marriage, after first converting the woman to Islam.

      Apart from looting of wealth and destruction of property( India was the richest country on the planet when the Muslims invaded ) -- the 'Muslim invader aliens' committed grave atrocities against the local populace, and themselves, wallowing in immoral and unethical behaviour; except for one, it is said, Akbar.

      Right?

      Wrong !

      Akbar was NO different.

      Akbar forced the Hindus to the mandatory infidel kaffir tax Jizya which was in existence . Time and time again different people had approached seeking exemption from Jiziya.

      To be fair to Akbar , everytime the exemption was granted , but was never implemented

      His grandfather Babur was a drunkard and his father Humayun was an opium addict. Akbar permitted himself the practices of both vices .. Akbar's two sons died in early manhood from chronic alcoholism, and their elder brother was saved from the same fate by a strong constitution, and not by virtue.

      The Rajput women of Chittor prefered "Jauhar" (immolation) than to be captured and disrespectfully treated as servants and prostitutes in Akbar's harem. Both drinking and enganging in debauched sexual activities was inherited by Akbar from his ancestors.

      Abul Fazal in Ain-e-Akbari provides accounts of perverse homosexuality . But let it be known that Akbar was NOT a homosexual like his grandfather Babur.

      Prithviraj Chauhan would have defeated Ghori again, the second time -

      - but a sufi saint Khwajah Moinuddin Chisti whose dargah is at Ajmer - cheated him.

      Chauhan failed to listen to his mother about this sufi saint cum spy.

      yet today hindus go and pray at this dargah.

      punch into google search-

      THE FIRST SUPARI AND THE TURNING POINT OF INDIAN HISTORY VADAKAYIL

      Unlike the mughals who won fights by slimy deceit the rajputs were honorable warriors.

      Hemu's 82 years father who had escaped to Alwar , after his son was killed in the battle of panipat-- 1556 AD, was caught after 6 months and was beheaded for refusing to convert to Islam.

      Hemu was rendered unconscious by an arrow in the eye -- because he was leading his army from the front, like a true hindu .

      Unconscious hemu's head was severed by akbar himself, to secure the title of GHAZI. To be fair, he was told to do it, as he was too young ( age 14 ) to decide all this--on how to be a MAN..

      His is skull was sent to Kabul for display outside the 'Delhi Darwaza'. His headless torso was sent to Delhi and hung outside Purana Quila .

      while akbar and bairam khan were 8 miles from the frontline of battle at a safe place.

      Thousands of Hemu's army were beheaded and a several towers of skulls built with their heads, to strike terror into the hearts of Hindus.

      Throughout Akbar's reign, temples used to razed to the ground or misappropriated as mosques and dargahs for insignificant people.

      The para below will be contested-- so I give the source --though it is NOT my style.

      CONTINUED TO 3-

      Delete
    2. CONTINUED FROM 2-
      The Hindus were treated as third class citizens in Akbar's reign is evident from the Ain-i-Akbari. Abul Fazal writes, "... he [Husayn Khan, Akbar's governer at Lahore] ordered the Hindus as unbelievers to wear a patch (Tukra) near the shoulders, and thus got the nick name of Tukriya (patcher)." (Bochmann., p.403) The patch was obviously to mark the "unbelievers" out as pariahs for providing special degrading treatment. This was like the JUDE patch during the 2nd world war .

      Akbar is said to have built several forts and palaces and founded many townships. All of them were converted from Hindu structures after removing the Hindu motifs and retro-installing Islamic ones.

      Akbar became great by creating towns like Fatehpur Sikri. He simply renamed pre-existing townships of Hindu origin and claimed to for himself. Fatehpur Sikri has a massive defensive wall around it, enclosing redstone gateways and a majestic palace complex, explicitly in the Rajput style.

      Listen we know what this means !

      His grandfather Babur has written that Agra and "Sikri" housed several palaces equally magnificent . These 15th century references will, for now, suffice to prove the existence of Fatehpur Sikri before even Akbar was born, and that the beautiful buildings were not built by Akbar.

      Akbar has been given unecessary credit of being tolerant, secular and an altruist king. Hindus were quiet -but NOT anymore in this internet age.

      The nine-gem story of Akbar's court is FAKE .

      And so is the 9 gems of Emperor Vikramaditya's court as Vikramadita exsted 8500 years earlier.

      The white invader tried to back date Vikramaditya to accomodate the FAKE KaliDASA of Radha and Bharat fame .

      Akbar besieged Chitor in March 1568. The Rajputs put up a terrific fight but eventually lost.
      Akbar issued Fathnama-i-Chitor (Letter of victory from Chitor) upon his victory. He writes “in conformity with the happy injunction of the Quran (27:40)” he was “busy in subjugating the localities, habitations, forts and towns which are under the possession of the infidels…may God forsake and annihilate all of them, and thus raising the standard of Islam everywhere and removing the darkness of polytheism and violent sins by the use of sword. We destroy the places of worship of idols in those places and other parts of India. The praise be to Allah, who hath guided us to this, and we would not have found the way had it not been that Allah had guided us.”

      “In accordance with the imperative Command - And kill the idolaters all together (Quran 9:36), those defiant ones who were still offering resistance having formed themselves into knots of two to three hundred persons, were put to death and their women and children taken prisoners.”

      According to the various contemporary accounts of Abul Fazl, Badauni, etc, there were between 30,000 and 48,000 inhabitants inside the fort as Akbar’s victorious army entered it. Of those, 8,000 were Rajput warriors. The rest were women, children, and the aged. Akbar, according to his own fathnama, butchered the defenseless women and children. These accounts also confirm that many women, attempting to avoid rape by the Muslim marauders, committed jauhar. Akbar confirms what he did with those women and children that did not attempt jauhar: “According to the promise - Allah promised you many acquisitions which you will take (Quran 48:20), immense booty and spoils in cash and kind were acquired.”

      It is better that I say NO more !

      OVERKILL HAS NEVER BEEN MY STYLE !!!

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/09/qutab-minar-was-dhruv-stambh-vishnu.html

      capt ajit vadakayil

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  5. Yes Hitler was responsible for the India's independence although indirectly. His attack on London acted as a catalyst. But calling Akbar father of the nation is non sense. You missed Maratha worrier Shivaji who had frustrated mighty mughal empire and remained undefeated till his death. Hindu and Muslims were treated equally in his rule too. So in my opinion Shivaji suited better than Akbar as father of the nation. http://www.hinduhistory.info/the-epic-27-year-war-that-saved-hinduism/

    ReplyDelete
  6. So, Akbar was the first one to mix (all) relgiion(s) into politics!

    ReplyDelete
  7. katju saheb,This time you are wrong,i dont agree. there was jaziya tax during akbar,dat tells about his hidden intentions..

    ReplyDelete
  8. Katju are you an idiot? Do you know how many generations have gone through Indian schooling after freedom? Saying 90% of Indians are "idiots and fools" (I have not heard such statements after completing my high school; this shows your mindset) is so immature and childish!! You had been Chief Justice, behave and act in a way that will justify your former stature. It is so unbelievable that a person like you was holding such a high post. This is how you talk? A chief justice of a country?

    What have you done to "correct" the school syllabus? You must be the most under performing govt. authority and dumb as well. Someone should research and write a book on you as to how you became a chief justice and how did you handle court cases during your tenure.

    People already do not trust the news media. And you being the chairman of the press council shows what quality of journalism this country has to suffer! Very sad...

    ReplyDelete
  9. sir
    u disappoint me this time. though am an avid follower of u

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello Justice Katju Jee.. your writings are genuine and I applaud your efforts to tell the truth as is. --RamaK

    ReplyDelete
  11. sabarish
    March 11, 2015 at 6:46 AM
    Guruji..as you had predicted, our FM to unveil Gandhi statue in UK. No other better work?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    ######################################
    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
    March 11, 2015 at 7:23 AM
    hi s,

    R IS MORE INTERESTED IN KEEPING GANDHI ALIVE IN THE MINDS OF INDIAS.

    EVERY PERSON WHO COMES ON PRIME TIME TV AND KEEPS PRAISING GANDHI-DOES SO FOR A REASON .

    IN USA -- THEY PRAISE MARTIN LUTHER KING JR --WHO TOLD THE BLACKS TO ALLOW THE WHITES TO SHIT ON THEIR FACES.

    ALL TV CHANNELS BLANKED OUT WHAT KATJU TOLD -- THAT GANDHI IS A BRITISH AGENT .

    KATJU IS NOT SMALL FRY-- HE IS EX-CJI AND EX- PRESS COUNCIL CHAIRMAN.

    THEY ARE ALL BUSY DESCRIBING SHIKAR DHAWANs CENTURY AGAINST MINNOWS IRELAND.

    THE BENAMI MEDIA LITERALLY BRANDED HIM MAD -- " KATJU AT IT AGAIN " "HERE IS A NEW ONE FROM KATJU " TYPE SLIMY INNUENDO .

    THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF HASBARAS OPERATING ON INDIAN SOCIAL MEDIA .

    THIS IS IN THE MOSSAD BLUE BOOK-- DECLARE SOMEONE WHO TELLS THE TRUTH--AS MAD.

    when hilter's NO 2 RULDOPH HESS airdropped into britain to stop world war 2-- churchill promptly declared him mad.

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/11/rudolf-hess-honourable-man-who-was.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/10/hasbara-jewish-propaganda-on-social.html

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    ReplyDelete
  12. Gandhiji gave respect to people of all communitites,casts and religion.He always opposed thhe idea of communalism .Certainly Akber is a great legend,but Gandhiji must be called the Father of our nation because he designed the great freedom struggle of india and in the fact that it was really successful. Gandhiji always taught people the message of self reliance,understanding and stressed on the importance of pride.

    Gandhiji never wanted to split the country into two.He always opposed the idea of splitting the nation.
    You do not morally have the right to call the path of satyagraha nonsensical ,if you are an indian and considering the noble position you held ,just because satyagraha was able to bring freedom to the country.In Fact indians on that day were not strong enough. indians were not successful enough to bring on such an armed revolution in the country.

    Gandhi's self reliance aimed to empower the citizens of india. It is in fact true there were and always will be people present which opposes the poor,but the idea of self reliance gives them morally the right opinion on the matter.How on earth can you say Katrina kaif must be made the prime minister of india ?

    GANDHIJI IS NEVER A BRITISH AGENT,YOU ARE A BRITISH AGENT ,How is that ??

    Gandhi's opinions and actions sometimes have remained different . in fact,he describes his life as an experiment of truth. Basically his inner voice of conscience always supported his basic views of life and action.

    Sir, i have always respected you.Difference in opinion does not mean disrespecting you.

    With regards
    Sabeeh


    ReplyDelete
  13. Critical writing. Really thought provokable

    ReplyDelete
  14. If acc to '90%****" KATJU Akbar is the real father then who is MAHARANA PRATAP according to him

    ReplyDelete
  15. Armed Struggle means uninterrupted supply of weapons, unending supply of fighters. This supply should be either domestically made or obtained from foreign sources. With the education system under British in disarray the students were not able to produce any guns needed on the scale for an Independence struggle nor they could set any factories to produce them. To depend on foreign suppliers for a struggle against British was suicidal. Without weapons supply creating brigades to fight is like sending cattle to British slaughter houses. Also Gandhi realized that the then congress was filled with British agents and spies. He also realized that the Indian kings have agreements that prevented them going against British. By this at least they were able to save 49% of the Indian land and its resources being plundered by British. Gandhi correctly assessed that once the freedom struggle starts he can bank on Kings for moral support and logistical help. With this in background he set the wheel of Independence in motion on a unique notion which he coined himself – Non Co-operation in non-violent way.

    Keeping the above pathetic scenario of the country, as an ablest field marshal Gandhi theorized that the only way to minimize tragic human loss which British will not hesitate to hoist on his fellow country-men was to start the battle of the mind than weapons. He said do not pay taxes. Do it yourself. Start with salt. Do not resist arrests go to jail. Like the ablest general Gandhi was able to correctly calculate that to win the war of Independence against British their financial resource base and thus their ability to fight should be cut off. Minimize the resource flow into British coffers and drain the resources in to spending on unwanted issues without firing a single bullet.

    http://greatgameindia.com/mahatma-gandhi-a-great-army-chief/

    ReplyDelete
  16. By self-help in creating cotton salt etc. he cut the revenue streams that supported British operational machinery. And with endless non resisting self-courting arrests and subsequent maintenance of the arrested; drained the resources of enemy into unwanted events.

    South Africans took the violent route at the same time. Their independence was granted only in 1980. Thousand were killed many more maimed whole country side lay desolate; for the population and death toll ratio was staggering.

    In India from the day Gandhi entered congress in 1920 it took 27 years for achieving the victory. With no communication systems, transport infrastructure with dozen linguistic groups Gandhi achieved the success in the battle with the victor of world war 2. He was the best strategist and an ablest general. He took a weapon a walking stick. His battle technique was Non Co-operation in Non-Violent way. His army was the Citizen Soldiers. His concept was Total war but he was careful in choosing the terminology. He called his struggle as Satyagraha – Pursuit of Truth; even it warrants angry pursuit. To understand him one has to understand war and peace and the strategies to win. He is the best general who used minimum human loss and resource loss to win a battle. On that account only a lay man can say Gandhi never fought a battle.

    http://greatgameindia.com/mahatma-gandhi-a-great-army-chief/

    ReplyDelete
  17. Under the British Occupied Territories of India (BOTI) (51% of India) British started an exhaustive comprehensive study of how to prevent anger from erupting and if erupted how to redirect or subdue the anger of their subjects from affecting British interests. The task was given to two brilliant personalities. One was a British educationist Robert McCaulay whose job was to recommend on methods of preventing anger by manipulating education reforms. The second personality was David Alan Hume, a senior British Intelligence Officer who was assigned the work of recommending to prevent incidences such as First War of Independence in British occupied territories.

    With the recommendations of McCaulay in the British occupied territories the traditional medium of instructions Sanskrit and Persian were banned and English medium education and associated dress was introduced. A gradual discredit of all that was Indian started in education and on the ground literally every note-worthy achievement of Indian civilization of centuries was virtually razed to dust. Slowly but steadily by 1890 a generation of Indians in British Occupied Territories of India (BOTI) started believing that whatever that is ‘English’ is synonymous with Development and English is equated to science and scientific development. It is this generation that paved the way for conquest of India under the plan created by the second personality David Alan Hume.

    David Alan Hume was a veteran British Spy chief in India and studied intelligence reports of past 35 years literally 35000 documents filed by British officers all across India, Indian social settings, castes hierarchies and their abilities to fight their interrelationships. His recommendation was there should be an Indian intermediate agency (agencies) that can claim superior to all other Indians and handle the anger of Indian masses of BOTI. He recommended these agencies be filled with absolutely loyal English educated anglophile Indians who must be monitored by seasoned British intelligence officers (both British and Indian origin specially trained for this purpose) for not wavering from their goal. Even if they waver these embedded spies will discredit them. The sole purpose of these agencies is to divert the attention and anger of population of Occupied Territories towards diversionary fratricidal ideologies promoted by the organizations set up by the chosen men of British Intelligence.
    For this a careful selection and nurturing of candidates from young age was necessary. British used the schools set up for this purpose. First they erased the memory of cultural history of the young boys. Then they indoctrinated them that British and European systems were superior. Later they were instructed to save the heathen or the poor Indians suffering from the lack of enlightenment.

    http://greatgameindia.com/mahatma-gandhi-a-great-army-chief/

    ReplyDelete
  18. Emperor Akbar introduced a new religion Deen-i-Ilahi. Do you know none of his courtiers, including his in-laws Rajput rulers, accepted Deeni-Ilahi, except for one person??? That notable exception was the court jester Birbal, who promptly accepted the new religion, which after Akbar's demise, vanished into oblivion

    ReplyDelete
  19. Akbar was a respecter of all religions, no doubt, and his revenue minister Raja Todar Mal, for the first time in India, introduced land measuring and weights. But Indians will never accept Akbar as the father of the nation because of ONE big reason, not because of Akbar's own making, but because of providence. It so happens that Akbar belongs to the dynasty of Taimur Lang (Lame), who massacred ONE LAKH Hindus in ONE SINGLE DAY in Delhi, after segregating Muslims and ordering them to go and hide near Siri Fort. Taimur used to claim himself as a 'ghazi' (protector of Islam), and he has mentioned this and other massacres of kaafirs (infidels) that he committed during his invasion of India. Katju Saheb, you may have read about the Jewish pogrom by Hitler, but very few people know about the pogrom of Hindus by Taimur.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Katju Saab,

    Sorry. I beg to differ with you on this !!

    Gandhi is 'NOT' the 'FATHER OF OUR NATION'!!!

    I accept only this view of yours ( I have congratulated you on your other post regarding Gandhi being a stooge of the powers-that-be).

    However, the real credit should not go to Akbar since he was an 'ILLITERATE'!!The Mughals did not inspire any confidence whatsoever by destroying the cultural edifice of the majority over whom they ruled (this is being seen in modern times by islamists who are bent on destroying magnificent aspects of cultural excellence without realizing that they are destroying what their own forefathers had built up).

    Akbar was a great emperor and THAT'S IT !! The lesser mentioned about him as a secular person, the better..!! I have visited most of the places of Mughal rule to form my opinion of both Akbar and his forefathers and descendants.

    The real foundations of this country was laid by the great king 'BHARATHA'. All our teachings, science, language, arts etc were a direct result of him and his descendants. No wonder, that our country is called "Bharat"!!!

    India is an anglicised name for it.

    As far as contemporary heroes of our times are concerned, it should go to Subhash Chandra Bose or Bhagha Jatin !!

    ReplyDelete
  21. see what captain has written the truthy. bhagha jain was real father of nation and not akbar

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.com/2012/10/bagha-jatin-father-of-our-nation-not-to.html

    ReplyDelete
  22. Dear Mr. Katju..........if you r saying that Akbar was the Father of India so can you please define that what will you say about Jhangir And Auranzeeb who killed thousands of HINDU priests and Sikh Dharam Guru's and Converted Lakhs of Hindus and Killds Lakhs of Hindus and Sikhs..........

    in Hindi
    Agar vo ek Rastrapita hota uski neetiya Bharatwaadi hoti or uski santaane Ek Shrestra Raste par chalte.........
    agar aap gandhi se sahmat nahi hai to ek aise vyakti ko to rastrapita mat banaye jisne sanskratik roop se bharat ko toda ho..

    or sabse dukh ki baat ye hai k bhartiyo ka Itihaas bhartiyo k dwara nahi likha gaya yo to muslimo ne likha hai fir angrejo (British) ne likha hai to vo kyo kisi hindu ya bhartiye k bare me likhenge vo to apne logo ke baare galat kyu likhenge

    sabse dukh ki baat aap jaise padhe likhe savyedhanik pad par rahe vyakti bhi aisi baat khayenge
    its very shaemfull

    ReplyDelete
  23. Katju SAHAB I agree with your gandhi comment however the akbar locking was not necessary

    ReplyDelete
  24. Katju SAHAB I agree with your gandhi comment however the akbar locking was not necessary

    ReplyDelete
  25. You know what i guessed in a public exam on a comment you made . I was sure if it was so nonsensical it must be u .

    ReplyDelete
  26. my comments got deleted, so the conversations on them.. truth doesn't seem acceptable to Mr. Katju.... JUSTICE no more..

    ReplyDelete
  27. Katju sir, you took a good step forward by bringing down a false-god created by british. Most of the heroes in our CBSE curriculum are false-gods and now their names are being used for selfish interest and to destabilize our country.

    We have already made a mistake by attributing the title 'father of our nation' to Mohandas Gandhi, and now you are are giving it to a tyrant, Akbar. Other readers have already pointed out his bigotry in their comments above. Do a proper research before putting up a blogpost.

    Well, I hope that you will be remembered as a PATRIOT in the history of SHINING INDIA, not as a DOUBLE AGENT or just a blogger with oblique informational content...

    ReplyDelete
  28. Replies
    1. you forgot ashoka?????!!! bcs there were no muslims?

      Delete
  29. we got independence bcs of end of old imperialism and dawn of two super powers and their cold war..their need for satellite states..just bcs all the people u met are idiots.. doesn't make 90%..indians idiots!!

    ReplyDelete
  30. what is your view on ambedkar??

    ReplyDelete
  31. It was Shivaji who held Aurangazeb and army with tooth and nail, and given though fight and establised Hindu Rajya. And later Aurangazeb was involved in war for 27 years and camped at Aurangabad to fight Marathas and exhuated and emptied is Royal treasury. The Real father of the Nationa is Shivaji who remained undefeated in is life span and treated Hindus And Muslims as equals.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Sir, is it necessary to have father of the Nation , just compare Shivaji and Akbar and just she there acomplishment in their lifes. You cant write anything , we can sense everything. Akbar was not ruling whole of india. How then he could have become father of the nation. Nations ask you the question on what basis you declare Akbar father of the nation. We require open debate on this topic. We want your next blog to compare Shivaji and Akbar point to point in each aspect of their life.........

    ReplyDelete
  33. RATISH IYER
    March 12, 2015 at 1:39 PM
    Dear Capt.

    1. Posted support for Katju's statement.

    2. Couldn't resist sending you this link of this small clip from Chandraprakash Dwivedi's CHANAKYA:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozrjT4NPBWs

    What an amazing speech about teacher's role in nation-building! Dr. Dwivedi deserves a Bharat Ratna for his efforts in giving us gems like CHANAKYA and UPANISHAD GANGA.

    JAI HIND!

    Regards

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    #################################
    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil

    March 12, 2015 at 4:04 PM
    hi ri,

    chanakya is indeed the FATHER OF OUR NATION.

    i want all my readers to read this post again-

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/08/chanakya-taxila-university-professor.html

    how many of our teachers in school taught us to love our WATAN - they taught us to love fake characters like GANDHI.

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    ReplyDelete
  34. RATISH IYER
    March 12, 2015 at 1:39 PM
    Dear Capt.

    1. Posted support for Katju's statement.

    2. Couldn't resist sending you this link of this small clip from Chandraprakash Dwivedi's CHANAKYA:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozrjT4NPBWs

    What an amazing speech about teacher's role in nation-building! Dr. Dwivedi deserves a Bharat Ratna for his efforts in giving us gems like CHANAKYA and UPANISHAD GANGA.

    JAI HIND!

    Regards

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    #################################
    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil

    March 12, 2015 at 4:04 PM
    hi ri,

    chanakya is indeed the FATHER OF OUR NATION.

    i want all my readers to read this post again-

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/08/chanakya-taxila-university-professor.html

    how many of our teachers in school taught us to love our WATAN - they taught us to love fake characters like GANDHI.

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    ReplyDelete
  35. Unknown

    March 13, 2015 at 6:32 PM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PojKUEVjqbQ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    ############################
    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil

    March 13, 2015 at 6:47 PM
    hi u,

    I HOPE OUR ALICE IN GUJJULAND HAS HALF THE PERCEPTION OF THIS IRANIAN PRESIDENT.

    EVERYBODY KNOWS THE MAIN HIDDEN TARGETS OF ZIONIST/ COW BOY RIDING POSSE/ EU / NATO IS INDIA AND CHINA .

    BECAUSE USA IS NOW NO 1 SUPER POWER-- RIGHT NOW CHINA HAS ALREADY BEATEN USA BY ECONOMY MIGHT --

    AND IN 20 YEARS INDIA WILL BE NO 1 SUPER POWER ON THIS PLANET -- RELEGATING USA TO NO 3.

    RUSSIAN PUTIN KNOW IT-- CHINESE XI KNOWS IT- YANK BAAA KNOWS IT--

    ONLY OR LITTLE BO PEEP MODI DOES NOT KNOW THIS .

    IT IS RIDICULOUS TO SEE THE WAY, HE WANTS TO GAIN ACCEPTANCE AMONG THE GORAGAANDS AND JOIN THE COWBOY RIDING POSSE .

    MODI DOES NOT KNOW HE IS LEADING A GREAT NATION -- MARCHING AHEAD TO A GREAT DESTINY AFTER 800 YEARS OF SLAVERY.

    AS LONG AS OUR LOK SABHA / RAJYA SABHA CONTINUE TO WORSHIP " AHIMSA " GANDHI ( PRODDED ON MY BENAMI MEDIA / SOLD OUT JUDICIARY ) -- BHARATMATA MAY SLIP AND FALL -

    NEVER TO GET UP AGAIN.

    WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA , WILL NOT ALLOW IT.

    JAI HIND !!

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    ReplyDelete
  36. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sharad-Yadav-continues-sexist-remarks-tells-Smriti-Irani-I-know-what-you-are/articleshow/46585284.cms

    SUBJECT : Sharad Yadav continues sexist remarks, tells Smriti Irani: 'I know what you are'

    #########################################

    IN THE PAST ONE YEAR 95% OF THE TIME OCCUPIED BY PILLARS OF MEDIA ( BENAMI MAIN STREAM ) AND LEGISLATURE ( RAJYA SABHA ) IS FOR MATTERS WHICH DIVIDE AND DESTROY INDIA . . .

    HARDLY ANYTIME IS SPENT ON NATION BUILDING.

    THE CULPRITS CAN EASILY BE IDENTIFIED- AS THEY ARE CONTROLLED BY FOREIGN FORCES WHO ARE JEALOUS OF INDIAs PROGRESS . . . .

    THE WHITE NATIONS DO NOT WANT YELLOW CHINA AND BROWN INDIA TO OVERTAKE THEM AND BECOME THE PLANETS NO 1 AND 2 SUPERPOWERS . . .

    THESE WHITE ZIONIST NATIONS CONTROL THEIR TROJAN HORSE NGOs IN INDIA . . .

    EVERY DAY THE BENAMI MAIN STREAM MEDIA TALKS ABOUT GANG RAPE-- WHICH IS A LIE . .

    INDIA HAS 1260 MILLION PEOPLE--

    OUR RAPE BY PERCENTAGE ( NOT NUMBERS ) IS THE LOWEST ON THE PLANET .

    OUR INDIAN WOMEN ARE THE MOST RESPECTED AND SAFEST ON THE PLANET - I HAVE TRAVELLED FOR 4 DECADES AND I KNOW . .- UNLIKE OTHERS WHO DEPEND ON WHITE MANs LIES IN MEDIA . . . .

    INDIA HAS THE LOWEST RAPE/ DIVORCE/ VIOLENT CRIME/ INCARCERATION / HOMOSEXUAL PERCENTAGE ON THE PLANET . . .

    NUMBERS ARE IRRELEVANT - ONLY PERCENTAGE MATTERS. . . .

    THE WEST IS JEALOUS OF THE HAPPINESS / HARMONY IN INDIAN HOMES . . .

    TO BREAK INDIA THE ZIONISTS MUST FIRST BREAK OUR SOCIAL FABRIC -

    THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE TRYING , USING THEIR BENAMI MEDIA AND JUDAS POLITICIANS IN THEIR PAYROLL IN INDIAN PARLIAMENT . . .

    IN 20 YEARS INDIA WILL BECOME THE PLANETS NO 1 SUPERPOWER .

    THE BROWN MAN MUST FORGET THE LEGACY OF GANDHI . . .

    THE BLACK MAN MUST FORGET THE LEGACY OF MARTIN LUTHER KING JR .

    BOTH THESE MEN CREATED AND ELIMINATED BY THE SAME BIG BROTHER TOLD THEIR ENSLAVED PEOPLE TO LOVE THE WHITE AGGRESSORS WHO OPPRESSED THEM . . .

    THE FREE WORLD HAS WOKEN UP . . . THANKS GOD PUTIN LEADS US WITH BRICS . . .

    punch into Google search - -

    . . . . VLADIMIR PUTIN THE HERO OF THE FREE WORLD VADAKAYIL . . .

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    ReplyDelete
  37. http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-editorials/repeal-section-377-india-shouldnt-have-supported-russias-anti-gay-resolution-at-the-un/?utm_source=TOInewHP_TILwidget&utm_campaign=TOInewHP&utm_medium=Widget_Stry

    THE ENTIRE BENAMI MEDIA WANTS TO SCRAP SEC 377 AND ALLOW GAY MARRIAGES IN INDIA . .

    THE WEST KNOWS THAT INDIA WILL BE THIS PLANETs NO 1 SUPERPOWER IN 20 YEARS . .

    THEY ARE JEALOUS OF THE HAPPINESS AND HARMONY OF INDIAN HOMES . . .

    THEY ARE JEALOUS THAT INDIA HAS THE PLANETs LEAST DIVORCES / RAPE / VIOLENT CRIMES / SUICIDES / LONELINESS / HOMOSEXUALS BY PERCENTAGE . .

    THE BENAMI MEDIA DELIBERATELY QUOTES NUMBERS WHICH HAVE NO MEANING AS INDIA HAS 1300 MILLION PEOPLE. - - ONLY PERCENTAGES MATTER , NEVER NUMBERS . . .

    THE ENTIRE DECADENT WEST SUFFERS FROM THE WORST HUMAN SUFFERING CALLED LONELINESS . . .

    IT DOES NOT REQUIRE SIGMUND FREUD ( WHO BECAME A HINDUS AND GOT HIMSELF CREMATED ) TO SAY THAT AFTER HOMOSEXUAL SEX BOTH FEEL EXTREMELY LONELY . .

    WHAT IS THE BENAMI MEDIA AND FOREIGN FUNDED NGOs SPONSORING HOMOSEXUALITY IN INDIA ?

    IS THIS THE POUND OF FLESH APCO MODI GAVE ZIONISTS IN RETURN FOR THE PM CHAIR ?

    WHY IS MODI ALLOWING ALL THIS ?

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/12/ipc-section-377-love-lust-perversion.html

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    ReplyDelete
  38. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  39. THIS IS WHAT AKBAR IS
    https://www.facebook.com/TheAryavart/photos/a.390090437679200.90800.389972804357630/999031310118440/?type=1&comment_id=999331496755088&notif_t=like

    ReplyDelete
  40. Bombay High Court Recruitment 2015 Clerk Jobs


    Its really great information i am glad you to found this kind of website...............

    ReplyDelete

  41. Latest Govt Bank Jobs 2015-16

    I have visited this blog first time and i got a lot of informative data from here which is quiet helpful for me indeed. ..................

    ReplyDelete

  42. Latest Govt Bank Job Notification 2016

    Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed..............!

    ReplyDelete
  43. MES 762 Tradesman Mate Recruitment 2015-16


    It was helpful and will really help me in building my new blog traffic and increasing my readers per day..................

    ReplyDelete