Choodis for ignoring Dattu's corruption

I am hereby presenting choodis to the following categories of people who have turned a Nelson's eye to Dattu's massive corruption :

1. Senior Advocates of the Supreme Court. Taking inspiration from Gen. V.K.Singh, I have coined for them a new term : ' Lawstitutes '. While posing to be men of honour, they will not do anything to displease sitting Judges, though once the Judge has retired, they will not hesitate to shamelessly kick him, as I have experienced myself .

2. Mediapersons, who have already been branded as 'presstitutes'. They will maintain the Buddha's ' noble silence ' vis-a-vis sitting judges

3. Members of Parliament, who are, of course, politisstitutes.

   I can also safely predict that a couple of months before Dattu retires on 2nd December 2015, suddenly a clamour for his impeachment will begin, which of course would mean nothing as Dattu would  retire shortly thereafter, having enjoyed to the hilt the fruits of office, and making the impeachment process infructuous

 Hari Om

Dattu and cowardly Indian media

 I have posted 4 articles on Dattu ( the present CJI ) on my blog justicekatju.blogspot.in. Please read them. Dattu is prima facie thoroughly corrupt, as these articles disclose. However, the cowardly Indian media does not even investigate these allegations, as I had requested them to do

Questions to Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad

 Dattu is so shameless that he will never reply to the serious allegations in the dossier against him, or explain where he got the money for building/acquiring the palatial house in Bangalore ( whose photos I have posted on facebook )..Most of the the Indian media are even more shameless since they would not even investigate the serious charges, although I had personally given copies of the dossier to many leading newspapers well before Dattu's elevation as CJI.. Gen. V.K.Singh is vindicated.

 That brings us to Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad, who was at the relevant time the Union Law Minister, and to whom also I gave a copy of the dossier, well before Dattu was appointed CJI, with the request that he investigate the serious charges against Dattu contained in the dossier.

 Now here are some questions for Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad :

1. Is it, or is it not, true that over a month before it was announced by the Govt. of India that Dattu would be the next CJI, I sent you a copy of the dossier containing several serious allegations against Dattu, particularly relating to the land deals in his and his family members name, many of them in clear violation of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act,which revealed he had amassed a fortune, and the palatial house he had built/acquired in Bangalore ?

2. If your answer to the above is in the affirmative, what action did you take  thereafter ? Did you inform about the dossier to the Prime Minister, and if you did, what action did you and the Prime Minister take ? Did you and the Prime Minister get the allegations against Dattu verified, or you simply ignored them ?

3. If you got them verified, through whom did you get them verified, and where is the report of the agency which verified them ?

4. Did you or some other member of your government show the dossier to Dattu and ask for his explanation ? If not, why not ? If yes, what explanation did he give ? Did you specifically ask where he got the money for building/acquiring the palatial house in Bangalore, and acquiring the several plots in his and his family members name, and why was his wife's name mentioned showing the name of her father and not himself ? Is it true that several of the transactions were in violation of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act ?

5. Every Supreme Court Judge has to give a list of his assets which are put up on the Supreme Court website ( supremecourtof india.nic.in ) Did you, or did you not, look into the list of assets disclosed by Dattu ? It seems he has not mentioned therein about the palatial house in Bangalore which he has built/acquired, and many of the plots he and his family members have acquired in violation of law ( particularly the Karnataka land Reforms Act ) or the relevant schemes ? Did you ask Dattu for his explanation for this omission ?

Investigate Dattu

This is an email I received today from the Economic Times

Date: 12 May 2015 8:43:44 pm IST

To: justicekatju@gmail.com

Subject: Request-response required-Urgent

Sir,

1-The Economic Times is working on a story on Chief Justice of India

HL Dattu. I have been given to understand that a complaint regarding

assets of Justice Dattu and his wife was forwarded to you. May i

request you to share details of follow up action, if any, and your

views on the said complaint.

2-The complaint was signed by Pt Narendra Sharma, he had attached all

the relevant documents, and in August 2014, forwarded it to you for

necessary action.

I shall be extremely grateful, if you could forward your comments, on

the above mentioned issues, at the earliest

Regards

The Economic Times Delhi

Here is my reply :

From: mark_katju@yahoo.co.in

Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 7:05

To: markandey katju

Dear Sir,

 I am in receipt of your email.

At present I am in Vancouver, and am likely to return to India in mid-July.

 I did indeed receive a dossier from someone containing documentary proof of a large amount of properties amassed by Justice Dattu during his judicial career. This was before he became CJI. I got several copies made of the dossier, and gave a copy each to Mr.Shanti Bhushan, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court and his son Prashant, Dhananjaya Mahapatra of Times of India ( who came to my house to collect a copy, and with whom I had a detailed discussion about the matter ), and journalists of Indian Express and The Hindu. I also sent one copy to Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad, the then Union Law Minister. I suggest you ask some of these people for the dossier as they may be having their copy which I gave them. Regrettably, none of them did anything in the matter, although I only requested them to investigate because if the allegations in the dossier were correct Dattu should not be made the CJI

 I do not have a copy of the dossier with me at present, but I have it with me in my flat in Noida, which I can give you on my return. However, my recollection of the contents of the dossier, which I had read carefully, is as follows :

There are a large number of plots in or near Bangalore purchased in the name of Justice Dattu’s wife Gayathri. Photocopies of the sale deeds by which they were purchased are in the dossier. These sale deeds mention the name of Justice Dattu’s wife Gayathri, but interestingly enough describe her as daughter of Guravayoor ( probably her father’s name ), and not wife of Justice Dattu. This is strange, since the plots were purchased long after her marriage. Was this done to conceal these transactions ?

Most of these plots were purchased in violation of the provisions of the Karnatak Land Reforms Act, which state that a person having family income of over Rs. 2 lacs per year cannot buy land in the rural areas of Karnataka. At the time of purchase these plots were all technically in the rural area, though in reality they had become part of Bangalore as the city ( like all cities in India ) had expanded. Justice Dattu’s income at the time of purchase was over Rs. 15 lacs per year ( the approximate  salary of High Court Judges ), and so his wife illegally purchased these plots.

3. Justice Dattu has built a palatial house in Bangalore, allegedly on 1200 sq.m. land  Possibly that house itself would be worth Rs 50 crore or more. Someone sent me photos of that house by email, and I will try to retrieve them and send them to you.

One plot of land in Bangalore was allotted to Justice Dattu, though it could not have been allotted to him because under the relevant scheme such plots could only be allotted to an employee of the Karnataka High Court. A High Court Judge is not an employee ( he holds a Constitutional post, and is no one’s employee ). Justice Dattu was a Karnataka High Court Judge at that time.

One plot of land in Bangalore was allotted to Justice Dattu under a scheme which had a term that a person already having a plot of land in Bangalore could not be allotted a plot. Justice Dattu already had plots in Bamgalore, either in his own name or in his wife or children’s name at that time.

      Several other illegalities allegedly committed by Dattu ( which I do not remember at present ) were mentioned in the dossier, which consisted of about 100 pages, many being photocopies of sale deeds and other documents.

   On receiving the dossier I spoke on telephone to Mr. Shanti Bhushan, who sent his son Prashant to my house to collect a copy of the dossier. I had got several copies of the dossier made, and I gave one copy to Prashant when he came to my house, and also discussed the allegations therein.The next day Mr. Shanti Bhushan telephoned me and said the allegations against Dattu in the dossier were very serious. I then told him that in that case the Committee on Judicial Accountability ( COJA ), which consists of senior lawyers of the Supreme Court as well as retired Judges, and of which he and Prashant are members, should hold an enquiry, and at the same time write to the President and Prime Minister not to make Dattu a substantive CJI but only Acting CJI until the enquiry was over.  If the allegations in the dossier were found false then he could be confirmed as CJI. However,  regrettably, nothing was done by Mr. Shanti Bhushan or the others to whom I had sent copies of the dossier.

  I may before concluding add that I have no personal grudge against Dattu, and my only motive in doing what I did was to have upright people on top posts in the judiciary. I only wanted an enquiry into the allegations in the dossier, and I did not say that the allegations were necessarily correct ( though the documentary proof in the dossier does indicate serious illegalities ). But people, including journalists to whom I gave copies of the dossier, were not even willing to investigate. is the media scared ?

  Justice Katju